Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Batik Small and Medium Scale Enterprises Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v7i2.4714Abstract
The research was conducted to analyze the relationship between sustainable supply chain management practices and the performance of environmentally friendly batik SMEs. The concept of Sustainable Supply Chain Management has become the right choice for business activities. Eco-friendly batik SMEs must be responsible for environmental practices and social practices in the scope of internal and external management and their impact on all dimensions of corporate sustainability performance. The research sample was 70 owners of environmentally friendly batik SMEs in several cities in Central Java and Yogyakarta. Data analysis was performed through Partial Least Squares (PLS). The general conclusion of this research was that internal management and external management influenced corporate performance. However, supplier assessment and supervision and supplier collaboration did not influence corporate performance. Keywords: internal management, external management, SME performance, MRPB, Triple Bottom Line, Eco-friendly batik UKMReferences
Beske, P., & Seuring, S. (2014). Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 19(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0432
Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2002). by. 23(1), 145–180.
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
Christian Buste, M. ., Scheleper, M. ., & Stephan, M. . (2016). International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management Article information?: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(5), 442–468. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0155
de Giovanni, P. (2012). Do internal and external environmental management contribute to the triple bottom line? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211212574
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. In Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (Vol. 15). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861
Dewi, B. K. (2013). Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Laba Perusahaan Pada UKM Batik Bakaran Di Kota PAti.
Fasikhah, I. (2018). Akuntansi in D on Esi a Determinan Environmental Disclosures Perusahaan Manufaktur. 7(1), 31–55.
Ferdinand, A. (2011). Metode Penelitian Manajemen Pedoman Penelitian Untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi ilmu Manajemen . Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro.
Gawankar, S. A., Kamble, S., & Raut, R. (2017). An investigation of the relationship between supply chain management practices (SCMP) on supply chain performance measurement (SCPM) of Indian retail chain using SEM. Benchmarking, 24(1), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2015-0123
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2012). Partial Least Square: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi SmartOLS 2.0 M3. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
Gotschol, A., De Giovanni, P., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2014). Is environmental management an economically sustainable business? Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.001
Handayani, A. R. (2010). Pengaruh Environmental Performance Terhadap Environmental Disclosure dan Economic Performance Serta Environmental Disclosure Terhadap Economic Performance
Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3
Jabbour, C. J. C., De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Govindan, K., De Freitas, T. P., Soubihia, D. F., Kannan, D., & Latan, H. (2016). Barriers to the adoption of green operational practices at Brazilian companies: Effects on green and operational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3042–3058. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154997
Januarti, I., & Apriyanti, D. (2005). Pengaruh Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Keungan.
Jing, W., & Dai, J. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 118(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2016-0540
John Elkington. (1997). Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line". Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22.
KASSINIS, G. I., & SOTERIOU, A. C. (2009). Greening the Service Profit Chain: the Impact of Environmental Management Practices. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00210.x
Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010
Krause, D. R., Scannell, T. V., & Calantone, R. J. (2000). A Structural Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buying Firms’ Strategies to Improve Supplier Performance. Decision Sciences, 31(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb00923.x
Kurniawan, W., Purwanto, & Sudarno. (2014). Strategi Pengelolaan Air Limbah Sentra Umkm Batik Yang Berkelanjutan Di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 11(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.11.2.62-72
Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(4), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610679128
Mauidzoh, U., & Zabidi, Y. (2013). Penilaian Kinerja Supplier. Industri, 1, 159–171.
Ortas, E., Moneva, J. M., & Álvarez, I. (2014). Sustainable supply chain and company performance: A global examination.
Supply Chain Management, 19(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0444
Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). How plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01050.x
Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J., & Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x
Tachizawa, E. M., & Wong, C. Y. (2014). Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 19, 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0070
Walker, H., & Jones, N. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management across the UK private sector. Supply Chain Management, 17(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211212177
Wantao. (2018). Integrated green supply chain management and operational performance Supply Chain Management?: An International Journal Article information?: (16).
Wanty, E. E. (2006). Analisis Produksi Batik Cap Dari UKM Batik Kota Pekalongan.
Wells, P., & Seitz, M. (2005). Business models and closed-loop supply chains: A typology. Supply Chain Management, 10(4), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510612712
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510593148
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Which means you are free to:- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.