Pengukuran Tingkat Efisiensi Usaha Kecil dan Menengah di Karesidenan Surakarta Tahun 2015-2016

Authors

  • Tia Putri Ariyani Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Malik Cahyadin Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v5i1.2557

Abstract

SMEs play an important role in the national economy. Therefore, stakeholders need to pay attention to develop SMEs by doing efficiency. This research aims to determine the value of the technical, cost, and allocate efficiency of SMEs in Surakarta residency during 2015 – 2016. This research uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) program. The input variable consists of labor, while the output variables consist of sale, asset, and profit. The results of this research show that the average values of technical and cost efficiency are equal. The SEMs of Sukoharjo Regency have average value of technical and cost efficiency in 2015 are 0.850 and increase to 0.864 in 2016. The SMEs of Wonogiri Regency have an efficiency value of 0.746 and increase to 0.755. The SMEs in Karanganyar Regency have an improved efficiency value from 0.648 to 0.735. The efficiency value of SMEs in Surakarta City decreases from 0.692 to 0.691. The efficiency of SMEs in Sragen Regency also decreases from 0.592 to 0.562. The allocate efficiency shows that SMEs in Surakarta Residency are effective. This research recommends that SME owners and local government need to stimulate input utilization to produce maximum output. Furthermore, SME owners also need to manage the availability of input appropriately.Keywords: Efficiency; SME; DEAUKM berperan penting dalam perekonomian nasional. Untuk itu, para stakeholders diharapkan mempunyai perhatian terhadap perkembangan UKM melalui penerapan efisiensi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui nilai efisiensi teknis, biaya, dan alokatif UKM di Karesidenan Surakarta tahun 2015-2016. Metode yang digunakan adalah program Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Variabel input meliputi tenaga kerja sedangkan variabel output adalah omset, asset, dan keuntungan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata efisiensi teknis dan biaya adalah sama. Nilai rata-rata efisiensi teknis dan biaya UKM Kabupaten Sukoharjo tahun 2015 sebesar 0.850 meningkat menjadi 0.864 di tahun 2016. UKM Kabupaten Wonogiri mempunyai nilai efisiensi sebesar 0.746 meningkat menjadi 0.755. UKM Kabupaten Karanganyar juga meningkat nilai efisiensinya dari 0.648 menjadi 0.735. Efisiensi UKM Kota Surakarta menurun dari 0.692 menjadi 0.691 sedangkan UKM Kabupaten Sragen mempunyai nilai efisiensi dari 0.592 menjadi 0.562. Hasil efisiensi alokatif menunjukkan bahwa semua UKM di Karesidenan Surakarta sudah efisien. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah pelaku usaha UKM dan pemerintah daerah sebaiknya mendorong pemanfaatan input yang dapat menghasilkan output secara maksimal. Selain itu, pelaku usaha UKM juga perlu mengelola ketersediaan dan pengelolaan input secara tepat.Kata Kunci : Efisiensi; UKM; DEA

Author Biographies

Tia Putri Ariyani, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret

Development Economics

Malik Cahyadin, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret

Development Economics

References

Anderson, D. 1982. Small-scale Industry In Developing Countries : A Discussion of the Issues. World Development, 10, 11, 913-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(82)90034-1

Bowlin, W. F. 1998. Measuring Performance: an Introduction to DEA. Journal of Cost Analysis, 27, 3, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08823871.1998.10462318

Charoenrat, T. & Harvie, C. 2014. The efficiency of SMEs in Thai manufacturing: A stochastic frontier analysis.

Economic Modelling, 43, 372–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.08.009

Coelli, T. J., et al. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. 2004. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 1-39). New York: Springer.

Fajar, M. N. D. 2016. UKM di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Farrell, M. J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120, 3, 253-290. DOI:10.2307/2343100

Holban, I. & Razvan, F. 2009. Internationalization of SME’s in the Context of the Economic Crisis. Economic and Applied Informatics, 45-50. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6372284.pdf

Horbach, J. 2016. The Impact of Resources Efficiency Measures on Performance in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Ruhr Economic Papers No. 643. Germany. Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. DOI:10.4419/86788748

Kuncoro, M. 2007. Ekonomika Industri Indonesia: Menuju Negara Industri 2030?. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.

Kurniawan, A. Y. 2008. Analisis Efisiensi Ekonomi dan Dayasaing Usahatani Jagung Pada Lahan Kering di Kabupaten Tamah Laut Kalimantan Selatan. Tesis Magister Sains. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB.

Le, V. & Harvie, C. 2010. Firm Performance in Vietnam: Evidence from Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises. Economics Working Papers wp10-04, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia. RePEc:uow:depec1:wp10-04

Le, V., Vu, X.-B. & Nghiem, S. 2018. Technical efficiency of small and medium manufacturing firms in Vietnam: A Stochastic meta-frontier analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.03.001

Madalina, B. 2013. Importance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Romanian Economy. Annals-Economy Series, 4, 205-212. RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2013:v:4:p:205-212

Malik, H. 2015. Bangun Industri Desa Selamatkan Bangsa : Strategi Pembangunan Industri Desa di Kabupaten Kaur, Bengkulu. Bogor : PT. Penerbit IPB Press.

Miroljub, H. & Petar, P. 2010. "Small and medium enterprises in Serbia in crisis circumstances. Proceedings-8th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2010),in: György Kadocsa (ed.), 8h International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking MEB 2010-Proceedings, 69-84, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management. RePEc:pkk:meb010:69-84

Penchev, P. 1998. The Small and Medium Size Enterprises in the Industry. Economic Studies Journal, 2, 112-133. RePEc:bas:econst:y:1998:i:2:p:112-133

Pérez-Gómez, P., Arbelo-Pérez, M. & Arbelo, A. 2018. Profit efficiency and its determinants in small and medium-sized enterprises in Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21, 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.08.003

Porcelli, F. 2009. Measurement of Technical Efficiency: A Brief Survey on Parametric and Non-parametric Techniques. University of Warwick.

Purwanto, P., Manongga, D. & Pakereng, M. 2014. Efficiency of Small and Medium sized Tofu Enterprises (SME) in Salatiga using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). International Journal of Computer Applications, 91, 12. DOI: 10.5120/15936-5252

Quayes, S. & Khalily, B. 2014. Efficiency of Microfinance Institution in Bangladesh. Economics Bulletin, 34, 3, 1512-1521. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263852236_Efficiency_of_Microfinance_Institutions_in_Bangladesh

Tambunan, T. T. H. 2002. Usaha Kecil dan Menengah di Indonesia : Beberapa Isu Penting. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Tambunan, T. T. H. 2012. Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah di Indonesia : Isu-Isu Penting. Jakarta : LP3ES.

Tasman, A. 2008. Ekonomi Produksi, Analisis Efisiensi dan Produktivitas. Chandra Pratama.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM).

Yang, J.-C. 2006. The efficiency of SMEs in the global market: Measuring the Korean performance. Journal of Policy Modeling, 28, 861–876. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.07.004

Downloads

Published

2020-03-24

How to Cite

Ariyani, T. P., & Cahyadin, M. (2020). Pengukuran Tingkat Efisiensi Usaha Kecil dan Menengah di Karesidenan Surakarta Tahun 2015-2016. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v5i1.2557