ANALISIS KINERJA EKONOMI SEBELUM DAN PADA ERA PENETAPAN KEISTIMEWAAN YOGYAKARTA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v4i2.2342

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the level of success of economic performance before and in the era of Yogyakarta privileges determination. This study uses several relevant analytical methods to analyze economic performance. The economic performance will be observed through economic indicators and development indicators in support of the principle of the Specialties of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY). The methods applied in this research are description of indicators to provide a description of the performance of all activities carried out before and on the appointment of privilege, paired sample t-test to analyze situations that existed before and when implemented a police and Data Panel Regression Analysis. It was concluded that the adjustment funds before the dana istimewa (danais) had given good growth to DIY. DIY growth was seen after the danais program in 2013-2015 which increased by 0.98%. This finding is in accordance with the expectations of researchers. Danais in the 2015 APBNP was recorded at 0.547 TrillionKeywords: Economic Performance, Inequality and Growth  ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat keberhasilan kinerja ekonomi sebelum dan pada era penetapan keistimewaan Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan beberapa metode analisis yang relevan untuk menganalisis kinerja ekonomi. Kinerja ekonomi akan diamati melalui indikator ekonomi dan indikator pembangunan untuk mendukung prinsip Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskripsi indikator untuk memberikan deskripsi kinerja semua kegiatan yang dilakukan sebelum dan pada penetapan keistimewaan, paired sample t-test untuk menganalisis situasi yang ada sebelum dan pada implementasi kebijakan dan Analisis Regresi Panel Data. Disimpulkan bahwa dana penyesuaian sebelum adanya danais telah memberikan pertumbuhan yang baik terhadap DIY. Pertumbuhan DIY terlihat setelah adanya program danais pada tahun 2013-2015 yang meningkat sebesar 0,98%. Temuan ini sesuai dengan harapan peneliti. Danais pada APBNP-2015 tercatat sebesar 0,547 Triliun.Kata Kunci: Kinerja Ekonomi, Ketimpangan, dan Pertumbuhan

References

BPS. (2014). D.I. Yogyakarta Dalam Angka 2014 / D.I. Yogyakarta in Figures 2014, 1–640.

Budiharsono, S. (1989). Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah (Teori, Model Perencanaan, dan Penerapannya). Bogor: IPB.

Chenery, H., & Syrquin, M. (1975). Pattemn of Development 1950-1970. (Oxford University Press., Ed.), A World Bank research publication. New York. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/482491468328816108/Patterns-of-development-1950-1970

Clark, C. O. (1949). Application of Flood-Storage Accounting Methods. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 30(4), 528–532. https://doi.org/10.1360/zd-2013-43-6-1064

Coudouel, A., Hentschel, J., & Wodon, Q. (2001). Well-Being Measurement and Analysis.

Fisher, R. . (1935). The Fiducial Argument in Statistical. Annals of Human Genetics, 6(4), 391–398.

Hirschman, A. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. (Y. U. Press, Ed.). New Haven.

Jaweng, R. E. (2013). Keistimewaan Yogyakarta: Babak Baru yang Menyisakan Sejumlah Catatan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Indonesia, 42, 105–119.

Kuncoro, M. (2006). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern Economic Growth. THe American Econonic Review, 63(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910352

Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x

Meier, G. M. (1995). Leading Issues in Economic Development (6th edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions. London: G. Duckworth.

Richardson. (1978). Regional & Urban Economics. Penguin Books.

Susanti et. al, H. (1995). Indikator-Indikator Makroekonomi. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FEUI.

Syaukani. (2005). Peningkatan Kinerja Eksekutif dan Implementasi Otonomi Daerah, dalam Haris, Syamsuddin (2005). Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: LIPI Press.

Widodo, T. (2006). Perencanaan Pembangunan: Aplikasi Komputer Era Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Yasa, I. K. O. A., & Arka, S. (2015). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Disparitas Pendapatan Antardaerah Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udaya, 4(2), 129–137.

Yeniwati. (2013). PENDAHULUAN Ketimpangan , pemerataan , dan infrastruktur sebenarnya telah dikenal cukup lama di Indonesia , misalnya melatar belakangi program padat karya berbagai pembangunan infrastruktur , berbagai program jaring pengaman sosial ; pembangunan jaringan, II(3), 1–21.

Ying, L. G. (1999). China’s Changing Regional Disparities during the Reform Period. Economic Geography, 75(1), 59–70.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-23

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions. 
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  5. Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  Which means you are free to:
    • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.