Sentence Complexity Analysis in Selected Students’ Scientific Papers: A Closer Look on Abstract Section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33633/es.v6i01.8080Abstract
Abstract. Abstract is an essential part of a scientific paper. However, according to the finding of researchers working in the repository at the (UIN) Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, many students still do not comply with the rules for writing scientific papers. This study aims to analyze the types of sentence complexity in the thesis abstracts of UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh students and the level of use of sentence complexity in scientific papers by students of UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive and content analysis methods. The data were obtained from the Repository UIN Ar-Raniry through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s method. The result shows four types of sentence complexity in abstract writing, namely simple sentence (24.58%), compound sentence (25.97%), complex sentence (26.25%,) and compound-complex Sentence (23.19 %). The level of sentence complexity in student scientific abstracts includes complex sentences containing independent clause + noun clause, independent clause + adjective clause, independent clause + noun clause + adverbial clause. This finding contributes to improving the skills of students' ability in scientific writing.Keywords: abstract writing; scientific papers; sentence complexityAbstrak. Abstrak merupakan bagian terpenting dalam sebuah karya ilmiah. Menurut temuan peneliti dari repositori UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, masih banyak mahasiswa yang tidak mematuhi aturan penulisan karya ilmiah. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis jenis kompleksitas kalimat dalam abstrak skripsi mahasiswa UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh dan tingkat penggunaan kompleksitas kalimat dalam karya ilmiah oleh mahasiswa UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis deskriptif yang menggunakan pendekatan analisis isi. Data diperoleh dari Repository UIN Ar-Raniry melalui teknik pengambilan sampel purposive. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode Miles and Huberman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat empat jenis kompleksitas kalimat dalam penulisan abstrak yang terdiri atas kalimat sederhana 24,58%, kalimat majemuk 25,97%, kalimat kompleks 26,25%, dan kalimat majemuk-kompleks 23,19%. Tingkat kerumitan kalimat dalam menulis abstrak ilmiah terdiri atas kalimat kompleks yang mengandung independent clause + noun clause, independent clause + adjective clause, independent clause + noun clause + adverbial clause. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan kemampuan mahasiswa dalam menulis ilmiah.Kata kunci: kompleksitas kalimat; karya ilmiah; penulisan abstrakReferences
Aggavamsa, V. (2020). An analytical study on the usage of complex sentence structures from the book on the life of the Buddha written by rev. Siridhamma. Journal of MCU Humanities Review, 6(2), 215-226.
Al-Mudhaffari, M., H, S., & Abdullah, I. (2020). Interactional strategies in L2 writing: Exploring hedging and boosting strategies in applied linguistics research articles. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.20.1.9
Altenberg, E. P. and R. M. V. (2010). English grammar. Cambridge university press.
Bernstein & Costa (2021). Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children's dysfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5203.278
Curran, M. (2020). Complex sentences in an elementary science curriculum: A research note. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 329-335.
Demirezen, M. (2013). The recognition of extended simple sentences as a teaching writing problem. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70(January 2013), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.093
Effendi, M. S., U., & Rachman, U. A. (2017). A study on grammar teaching at an English Education Department in an EFL context. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 5(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0501005.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garrido, M. E. V. (2017). Characterizing level iv students’ use of engagement resources in academic writing in English: An exploratory study from a systemic functional perspective. [Thesis, Universidad del Norte]. Retrieved from https://manglar.uninorte.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10584/8125/132793.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9): 1277-1288.
Kröll, M., Schulze, G., & Kern, R. (2014). A study of scientific writing: Comparing theoretical guidelines with practical implementation. In Proceedings of the COLING Workshop on Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Analyzing Technical Language (pp. 48-55).
Madkur, A. (2013). Grammatical analysis on the abstract of scientific writing. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 52-67.
Melinda & Suhartono. (2022). Kompleksitas kalimat dalam teks narasi pemelajar BIPA di Walailak University, Thailand. 2, 31–40.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Oshima, A. H., & Oshima, A. (2007). Introduction to academic English.
Radford, A. (2002). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press.
Risani, T. D. (2020). Writing news item in English language teaching context: Line apps platform for senior high school students. Utamax: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 2(1), 24-28.
Saragih, W. & Hutajulu, C. (2020). Types of sentences used by male and female writers in journal article abstracts. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v1i1.345.
Scott, C. M. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension.
Sezen, E.S. (2011). Teaching simple and compound sentences with computers at intermediate level. Dil Dergisi, 0(154), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1501/dilder_0000000158
Sharp, D. (2002). Kipling’s guide to writing a scientific paper. Croatian Medical Journal, 43(3), 262–267.
Simkhada, P., Van Teijlingen, E., Hundley, V., & Simkhada, B. D. (2013). Writing an abstract for a scientific conference. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 11(3), 262-265.
Steffani, S. A., & Dachtyl, III, L. A. (2007). Identifying embedded and conjoined complex sentences: Making it simple. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 34(Spring), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_34_s_44
Subekti, A. S. (2017). A study of the mastery of complex sentences of pre-service English teachers. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES), 4(2), 1-12.
Suparyanto & Rosad (2020). Importance of teaching writing as language skill. In Suparyanto dan Rosad (Vol. 5, Issue 3).
Van, D., & Jordaan, H. (2009). An aspect of language for academic purposes in secondary education: Complex sentence comprehension by learners in an integrated gauteng school. South African Journal of Education, 29(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v29n2a260
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H. P., & Vahtrick, L. (2017). Linguistic complexity in second language development: Variability and variation at advanced stages. Recherches En Didactique Des Langues et Des Cultures, 14(1), 0–27. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.1450
Warren & Gibson. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Journal of Cognition Volume 85, Issue 1, August 2002, p. 7
Winter, E. O. (2020). Towards a contextual grammar of English: The clause and its place in the definition of sentence. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074694
