Beyond Binary Fraud Detection: Amount-Aware Operational Ranking for Transaction Risk Prioritization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62411/jcta.16260Keywords:
Amount-Aware Operational Ranking, Binary Classification, Financial Fraud Detection, Fraud-Risk Prioritization, Investigation Budget, Learning-to-Rank, Operational Risk Assessment, Transaction Fraud DetectionAbstract
Fraud detection in digital financial transactions is traditionally formulated as a binary classification problem, although real-world fraud investigation requires analysts to prioritize a limited number of suspicious transactions according to operational risk and potential financial impact. This study reformulates fraud detection as an amount-aware operational ranking problem for fraud-risk prioritization. Transactions are organized into time-window query groups, and fraudulent transactions are assigned graded relevance based on training-only transaction-amount quartiles, enabling the ranking objective to distinguish low- and high-severity fraud without relying on proprietary cost matrices. The proposed formulation is implemented using a representative Learning-to-Rank framework based on LambdaMART, while an out-of-fold XGBoost risk score is incorporated as an auxiliary feature to refine the ranking representation rather than serve as the primary contribution. Experiments conducted on a public credit-card fraud dataset using chronological validation and future-holdout testing demonstrate that amount-aware relevance consistently improves severity-aware top-rank ordering compared with conventional binary relevance. The proposed HybridLTR_amount model significantly outperforms XGBClassifier and PureLTR_binary in terms of all-query NDCG@10, whereas its performance is not statistically different from PureLTR_amount, indicating that the primary empirical improvement is attributable to the amount-aware ranking formulation rather than the auxiliary hybrid component. Additional operational analyses show that high-risk transactions and fraudulent financial losses are concentrated within a compact top-ranked segment, while budget-oriented evaluation demonstrates the practical value of the proposed formulation under limited analyst review capacity. These findings establish amount-aware operational ranking as an effective formulation-centric framework for operational fraud-risk prioritization rather than as a new classification algorithm.References
R. R. Popat and J. Chaudhary, “A Survey on Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning,” in 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), May 2018, pp. 1120–1125. doi: 10.1109/ICOEI.2018.8553963.
K. H. Ahmed, S. Axelsson, Y. Li, and A. M. Sagheer, “A credit card fraud detection approach based on ensemble machine learning classifier with hybrid data sampling,” Mach. Learn. with Appl., vol. 20, p. 100675, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2025.100675.
W. Hilal, S. A. Gadsden, and J. Yawney, “Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 193, p. 116429, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429.
T. A. Gaav, H. U. Adoga, and T. Moses, “Recent Advances in Credit Card Fraud Detection: An Analytical Review of Frameworks, Methodologies, Datasets, and Challenges,” J. Futur. Artif. Intell. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 343–369, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.62411/faith.3048-3719-251.
C.-T. Chen, C. Lee, S.-H. Huang, and W.-C. Peng, “Credit Card Fraud Detection via Intelligent Sampling and Self-supervised Learning,” ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–29, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3641283.
H. Xu, “Trustworthy Fraud Detection under Distribution Shift: Calibrated, Cost-Optimal Ensembles with Statistical Guarantees and External Validation,” in Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Digital Society and Intelligent Computing, Nov. 2025, pp. 86–98. doi: 10.1145/3788910.3788923.
T.-Y. Liu, “Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval,” Found. Trends® Inf. Retr., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 225–331, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1561/1500000016.
C. J. C. Burges, “From RankNet to LambdaRank to LambdaMART: An Overview,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/MSR-TR-2010-82.pdf
T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Aug. 2016, pp. 785–794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
S. Motie and B. Raahemi, “Financial fraud detection using graph neural networks: A systematic review,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 240, p. 122156, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122156.
D. Cheng, Y. Zou, S. Xiang, and C. Jiang, “Graph neural networks for financial fraud detection: a review,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 19, no. 9, p. 199609, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11704-024-40474-y.
Y. Chen, C. Zhao, Y. Xu, C. Nie, and Y. Zhang, “Deep learning in financial fraud detection: Innovations, challenges, and applications,” Data Sci. Manag., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 100162, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.dsm.2025.08.002.
I. Y. Hafez, A. Y. Hafez, A. Saleh, A. A. Abd El-Mageed, and A. A. Abohany, “A systematic review of AI-enhanced techniques in credit card fraud detection,” J. Big Data, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-01048-8.
W. W. Li and T. Ma, “Learn to Rank Risky Investors: A Case Study of Predicting Retail Traders’ Behaviour and Profitability,” ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–33, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1145/3768623.
D. N. Wicaksono, D. R. I. M. Setiadi, A. Susanto, I. Harkespan, M. A. Mohamed, and A. Sambas, “Understanding Statistical and Temporal Representations for Large-Scale IoT DDoS Detection Through Ablation-Driven Analysis,” J. Comput. Theor. Appl., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 678–698, May 2026, doi: 10.62411/jcta.16126.
B. Yousefimehr and M. Ghatee, “A distribution-preserving method for resampling combined with LightGBM-LSTM for sequence-wise fraud detection in credit card transactions,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 262, p. 125661, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125661.
Y.-C. Shih, T.-S. Dai, Y.-P. Chen, Y.-W. Ti, W.-H. Wang, and Y. Kuo, “Fund transfer fraud detection: Analyzing irregular transactions and customer relationships with self-attention and graph neural networks,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 259, p. 125211, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125211.
W. Hyun, I. Lee, and B. Suh, “LEX-GNN: Label-Exploring Graph Neural Network for Accurate Fraud Detection,” in Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Oct. 2024, pp. 3802–3806. doi: 10.1145/3627673.3679956.
J. Lin, X. Guo, Y. Zhu, S. Mitchell, E. Altman, and J. Shun, “FraudGT: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Graph Transformer for Financial Fraud Detection,” in Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, Nov. 2024, pp. 292–300. doi: 10.1145/3677052.3698648.
L. Han et al., “Mitigating the Tail Effect in Fraud Detection by Community Enhanced Multi-Relation Graph Neural Networks,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2029–2041, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2025.3530467.
G. Tong, J. Qian, and J. Shen, “Adaptive metagraph neural network assisted by metagraph search for financial fraud detection,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 153, p. 110807, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110807.
T. John Berkmans and S. Karthick, “Anomaly detection in online credit card data using optimized multi-view heterogeneous graph neural networks,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 324, p. 113767, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113767.
J. Qian and G. Tong, “Metapath-guided graph neural networks for financial fraud detection,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 126, p. 110428, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110428.
X. Wang, J. Guo, X. Luo, and H. Yu, “DyHDGE: Dynamic heterogeneous transaction graph embedding for safety-centric fraud detection in financial scenarios,” J. Saf. Sci. Resil., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 486–497, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.05.005.
K. Li et al., “SEFraud: Graph-based Self-Explainable Fraud Detection via Interpretative Mask Learning,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Aug. 2024, pp. 5329–5338. doi: 10.1145/3637528.3671534.
Y. Tang and Y. Liang, “Credit card fraud detection based on federated graph learning,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 256, p. 124979, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124979.
P. Grover et al., “Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applications,” ArXiv. Sep. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14417
O. Ndama, S. Ndama, I. Bensassi, and E. M. En-Naimi, “A novel BERT-long short-term memory hybrid model for effective credit card fraud detection,” IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 788, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.11591/ijai.v15.i1.pp788-797.
A. Cherif, H. Ammar, M. Kalkatawi, S. Alshehri, and A. Imine, “Encoder–decoder graph neural network for credit card fraud detection,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 36, no. 3, p. 102003, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102003.
K. Shenoy, “Credit Card Transactions Fraud Detection Dataset,” Kaggle.com, 2019. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/kartik2112/fraud-detection
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hartatik Hartatik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
