Nahdlatul Ulama's Ideological Hegemony in Nadirsyah Hosen's Oration: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Sofi Aulia Rahmania Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v18i1.5737

Keywords:

religious moderation, ideological hegemony, critical discourse analysis

Abstract

As a multicultural country, Indonesia has big challenges to maintain the harmony and unity. Nowadays, intolerance and acute extremism are rampant that spread to a group of people. These problems could disrupt national stability and inter-religious harmonies. To prevent divisions and wars between religious believers, the Ministry of Religion is aggressively promoting religious moderation in every line of society. The religious moderation was often conveyed by religious leaders, government, and leaders of sciences. The focus of this research is the ideological hegemony of Islam Nusantara in the speech which is delivered by Dr. KH. Nadirsyah Hosen, LL.M, MA., Ph.D (Gus Nadir). The data are fragments of the oration discourse that represent the hegemony of Islam Nusantara, while the data source used is a scientific oration discourse delivered by Nadirsyah Hosen at the 2nd Annual Conference for Moslem. Meanwhile, the data analysis method used Norman Fairclouh's Critical Discourse Analysis model, the first stage was description. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that Gus Nadir represented the Islam Nusantara (Islamic archipelago's ideologies) in scientific orations with the theme of religious moderation through classification, rewording, overwording, and metaphors.

References

Addy, Joshua, and Emmanuel Amo Ofori. 2020. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Campaign Speech of a Ghanaian Opposition Leader.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 10(10):1279–87. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1010.14.

Bazzanella, C. 1996. Repetition in Dialogue. Tubingen: Niemeyer.

Bellamy, Richard. 1990. Teori Sosial Modern: Pespektif Itali. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Corson, D. 1995. Discourse and Power in Educational Organizations. Creskill: Hampton Press, N.J.

Darma, Yoce Aliah. 2014. Analisis Wacana Kritis Dalam Multiperspektif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Derakhshani, Mahdi, Shatha Naiyf Qaiwer, Bahram Kazemian, and Shafigeh Mohammadian. 2021. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Rhetorical Tropes in Donald Trump’s First Speech to the Un.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 11(10):1224–36. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1110.10.

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman.

Faruk. 2015. Revisi Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra Dari Strukturalisme Genetik Sampai Post-Modernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1976. Selection from The Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publisher.

Munawar, Bushra. 2018. “Discourse in Matrix of Power: The Textual Analysis of First Presidential Speech by Donald. J. Trump at White House in the Context of Norman Fairclough’s Modal of Three Levels of Discourse.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 7(7):80. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.7p.80.

Patria, Nezar; Arief, Andi. 2003. Antonio Gramsci: Negara Dan Hegemoni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Santoso, Wahyudi Joko. 2016. “Discourse Analysis Mc-Donald “Venez Comme Vous Êtes in Critical Pragmatic Perspective".” Pp. 406–13 in Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Transdisciplinary Linguistics (ISTL). Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Simon, Roger. 2004. Gagasan-Gagasan Politik Gramsci. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sipra, Muhammad Aslam, and Athar Rashid. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Martin Luther King’s Speech in Socio-Political Perspective.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 4(1):27–33. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.4n.1p.27.

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode Dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Tim Penyusun Kemenag RI. 2019. Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Balitbang dan Diklat Kemenag RI.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-13

How to Cite

Rahmania, S. A. (2022). Nahdlatul Ulama’s Ideological Hegemony in Nadirsyah Hosen’s Oration: A Critical Discourse Analysis. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 18(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v18i1.5737

Issue

Section

Articles