Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Linguistik Pragmatik
Abstract
This article explains the theory of speech acts proposed by John L. Austin and his student John R. Searle. Speech act theory is a sub-field of pragmatics. This field of study deals with the ways in which words can be used not only to present information but also to carry out actions. This theory considers three levels or components of speech: locutionary acts (the making of a meaningful statement, saying something that a hearer understands), illocutionary acts (saying something with a purpose, such as to inform), and perlocutionary acts (saying something that causes someone to act). Many view speech acts as the central units of communication, with phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of an utterance serving as ways of identifying the meaning of speaker’s utterance or illocutionary force. There are five types of Illocutionary point according to Searle: declarations, assertives, expressives, directives, and commissives (1979:viii). A speech act, in order to be successful, needs to be performed along certain types of conditions. These conditions were categorized by the linguist John Searle, who introduced the term felicity conditions: propositional content condition, preparatory condition, sincerity condition, and essential condition.
Keywords
Tindak tutur; Pragmatik; Ilokusi; Felicity condition
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v15i1.2382
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 13837 timesPDF - 27292 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Akhmad Saifudin
ISSN Online: 2548-9588
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is published by Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia.
Indexing & Archiving:
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
Konsorsium Program Studi Jepang Indonesia
Center for Foreign Language Training
Asosiasi Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang Indonesia