Translating Javanese unggah-ungguh into Japanese keigo

A Sociopragmatic study of address terms in Bumi Manusia and Arashi no Naka no Manya-ru

Authors

  • Kasmawati Kasmawati Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Lina Rosliana Tsukuba University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v22i1.14828

Keywords:

address terms, keigo, pragmatic transfer, sociopragmatics, translation strategies, unggah-ungguh

Abstract

This study investigated how Javanese unggah-ungguh address terms were translated into the Japanese keigo system and examined the sociopragmatic mechanisms underlying pragmatic transfer in literary translation. A qualitative descriptive design within a sociopragmatic framework was employed to analyze 70 address-term occurrences, purposively selected from the bilingual corpus of Bumi Manusia and its Japanese translation, Arashi no Naka no Manyaru. The data were analyzed by identifying translation strategies and interpreting the sociopragmatic shifts they generated in terms of politeness, social hierarchy, interpersonal relationships, and cultural identity. The findings revealed four principal translation strategies, namely Retention, Cultural Substitution, Functional Equivalence, and Generalization. Retention emerged as the dominant strategy, accounting for 64.3% of the data, indicating that the translator predominantly preserved culturally specific address forms while allowing their hierarchical meanings to be interpreted contextually within the Japanese honorific system. Cultural Substitution and Functional Equivalence reconstructed interpersonal relationships and institutional roles using culturally appropriate Japanese expressions, whereas Generalization was employed only for highly culture-specific aristocratic titles that lacked suitable equivalents. The study proposed an integrated sociopragmatic mechanism of pragmatic transfer that explained how different translation strategies systematically reconstructed social meaning across two distinct honorific systems. These findings contributed to translation studies and sociopragmatics by providing a comprehensive analytical framework for examining the translation of culturally embedded address terms across languages.

Author Biography

Lina Rosliana, Tsukuba University

Scopus ID: 57200087011

References

Ahmad I Alhojailan. (2024). A Sociopragmatic study of saudi Arabic address terms: Implications for cross-cultural communication. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 522–534. https://doi.org/ 10.30564/fls.v6i5.7031

Arfianingrum, P. (2020). Penerapan unggah-ungguh bahasa Jawa sesuai dengan konteks tingkat tutur budaya Jawa. Jurnal Prakarsa Paedagogia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/jpp.v3i2.6963

Baker, M. (2011). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation (Second). Routledge.

Brown, P., & Levinson, C. S. (2004). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Used (Thirteenth). The Press Syndicate of The University of Cambridge.

B.S. Maturbongs, W. R., Taqdir, T., & Kasmawati, K. (2024). Teknik penerjemahan onomatope gitaigo dalam novel Funiculi Funicula Before The Coffee Gets Cold. KIRYOKU, 8(2), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v8i2.544-556

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

D, Z. K., & Mills, S. (2011). Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.

Errington, J. J. (1988). Structure and style in Javanese A Semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated.

Hanum, I. L. (2021). Javanese Royal Kingdom addressing system in Kethoprak. Deskripsi Bahasa, 4(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.22146/db.v4i2.4735

Haristiani, N., & Renariah, R. (2017). Address terms in Japanese, Indonesian and Sundanese—As Politeness strategy in apology speech act: The Tenth Conference on Applied Linguistics and The Second English Language Teaching and Technology Conference in Collaboration with The First International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007168504230428

House, J. (2014). Translation Quality Assessment. Taylor & Francis.

Jakindo, E., Mayuni, I., & Rasyid, Y. (2018). Loan-address terms to enhance atmosphere of source novel in target novel. Humaniora, 9(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v9i3.4811

Kasmawati, K. (2021). Kata sapaan sebagai penanda sosiolek dalam terjemahan novel Burung-Burung Manyar karya Yb. Mangunwijaya oleh Megumi Funachi. KIRYOKU, 5(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v5i1.15-25

Keshavarz, M. H. (2001). The role of social context, intimacy, and distance in the choice of forms of address. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2001(148). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2001.015

Kusumastuti, F. (2018). Analyzing address forms in Chinese and Javanese: A Comparative study. Proceedings of the Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018). Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018), Surakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/prasasti-18.2018.71

Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.

MIYAKE, Y. (2022). Address terms as pronoun substitutes for speech act participants in Japanese and Javanese families (No. 63). 秋田英語英文学会. https://doi.org/10.20569/00006006

Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. Prentice-Hall International.

Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (Eds.). (1982). The theory and practice of translation (Vol. 8). Brill Archive.

Obana, Y. (2020). Japanese Politeness. Taylor & Francis.

Oshima, D. Y. (2023). The semantics and sociopragmatics of the Japanese honorific titles san, kun, and chan: Some focal points of variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 32(2), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-023-09255-9

Rozumko, A. (2023). Interpersonal relationships in translation: Address terms in the English and Polish translations of Henning Mankell’s The Dogs of Riga. Journal of Pragmatics, 206, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.013

Simangunsong, S. T., & Kasmawati, K. (2025). Analisis strategi penerjemahan 外来語 (gairaigo) pada media sosial Konsulat Jepang di Makassar. NAWA: Journal of Japanese Studies, 2(2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.69908/nawa.v2i2.43782

Surono, S. (2018). Address terms across cultures: A Sociopragmatic analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018). Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018), Surakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/prasasti-18.2018.59

Tauchid, A. (2018). In search of address terms in novel. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 11(02), 15. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v11i02.1278

Uyar, A. C., & Kiziltan, N. (2023). A Sociopragmatic analysis of the address forms in Turkish High School EFL textbook dialogues. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 0. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2023.506

Yonezawa, Y. (2021). The Mysterious address term anata “you” in Japanese (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.4

Yu, T., & Qiu, L. (2024). Analysis of address terms translation strategies: The Norms in the translation of address terms in moment in Peking. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 51(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/51/20240987

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Kasmawati, K., & Rosliana, L. (2026). Translating Javanese unggah-ungguh into Japanese keigo: A Sociopragmatic study of address terms in Bumi Manusia and Arashi no Naka no Manya-ru. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 22(1), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v22i1.14828

Issue

Section

Articles