Transforming language education through culturally responsive teaching
A Reflective case study in Japanese language micro teaching practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v22i1.13795Keywords:
classroom empathy, culturally responsive pedagogy, intercultural awareness, Japanese language teaching, reflective micro-teaching, teacher identityAbstract
This study explores how pre-service Japanese language teachers in Indonesia enact the principles of Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) through reflective micro teaching. By analyzing 14 teaching scripts, the research identified three dominant pedagogical features: inclusive instructional design, cultural contextualization, and empathetic teacher positioning. These features demonstrate early-stage responsiveness to learner identity and socio-cultural contexts. Drawing on CRT theory and recent literature, the study presents an integrative pedagogical framework and discusses its implications for teacher education. The findings suggest that CRT is not merely theoretical, but a practical orientation shaped through reflection, emotion, and situational awareness.References
Barnes, T. N., & McCallops, K. (2019). Perceptions of culturally responsive pedagogy in teaching SEL. Journal for Multicultural Education, 13(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-07-2017-0044
Benita, M., Levkovitz, T., & Roth, G. (2017). Integrative emotion regulation predicts adolescents’ prosocial behavior through the mediation of empathy. Learning and Instruction, 50, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.004
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological., 2, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Byram, M., & Wagner, M. (2018). Making a difference: Language teaching for intercultural and international dialogue. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12319
Chu, S. Y., Yang, T. H., & Wang, Y. W. (2023). Implementing culturally responsive teaching practices in inclusive preschools in Taiwan. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01586-5
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from North American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, 35(01), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0261444801001720
Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347320
Gay, G. (2015). The what, why, and how of culturally responsive teaching: International mandates, challenges, and opportunities. Multicultural Education Review, 7(3), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2015.1072079
González-Carriedo, R., Anderson, A. A., King, K. M., & ... (2024). Developing critical consciousness for culturally responsive teaching: an international teacher exchange program. Teacher …. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2024.2353591
Hasyim, R., Noni, N., & Nur, S. (2026). ICT tools in intercultural communication pedagogy: their impact on speaking competence and students’ strategies in negotiating meaning. Frontiers in Education, 10(January), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1742910
Kabilan, M. K. (2007). English language teachers reflecting on reflections: A Malaysian experience. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00099.x
Kim, Y. Y. (2007). Ideology, identity, and intercultural communication: An analysis of differing academic conceptions of cultural identity. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737181
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But That’s for Teaching ! The Culturally Relevant. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
Lash, M., Madrid Akpovo, S., & Cushner, K. (2022). Developing the intercultural competence of early childhood preservice teachers: preparing teachers for culturally diverse classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 43(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2020.1832631
Lawson, T. K., Knox, J., Romero, E., & ... (2024). Check yourself! Exploring current culturally responsive teaching assessment measures. Psychology in the School. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23189
Liu, K.-L. (2021). Kai-Li Liu. Taiwan Journal of TESOL Vol. 18.1, 1-27, 2021, 18(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202104
Meihami, H. (2023). Culturally responsive teaching in TEFL programs: exploring EFL teachers’ experiences. English Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00108-7
Mellom, P. J., Straubhaar, R., Balderas, C., Ariail, M., & Portes, P. R. (2018). “They come with nothing:” How professional development in a culturally responsive pedagogy shapes teacher attitudes towards Latino/a English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.013
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Cross-case data analysis. In Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.
Naz, F., Saha, T., & Hyun, K. (2024). Transportation curriculum with culturally responsive teaching: lessons learned from pre-service teachers and future transportation workforce. Transportation Research Record. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231184233
Nguyen, C. D., & Huynh, T. N. (2023). Teacher agency in culturally responsive teaching: Learning to teach ethnic minority students in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1974346
Pevec-Zimmer, S., Juang, L. P., & Schachner, M. K. (2024). Promoting awareness and self-efficacy for culturally responsive teaching of pre-service teachers through the identity project – A mixed methods study. Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2344086
Phipps, A., & Guilherme, M. (2004). Introduction: Why languages and Intercultural Communication are never just neutral. In Critical pedagogy political approaches to language and intercultural communication.
Sleeter, C. E. (2011). An agenda to strengthen culturally responsive pedagogy. English Teaching, 10(2), 7–23.
Tanase, M., & Kayaalp, D. (2023). From Theory to Practice: Dos of Culturally Responsive Teaching in Teacher Education Programs. Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00220574231221164
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills. Jossey-Bass.
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2016). for Preparing Culturally. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 9–16.
Walker, A. (2023). Transformative potential of culturally responsive teaching: Examining preservice teachers’ collaboration practices centering refugee youth. In Education Sciences. mdpi.com.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuyun Rosliyah, Ida Zulaeha, Hari Bakti Mardikantoro, Lispridona Diner

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors of LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya must agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














