Cross-cultural pragmatics of political apologies
Face management and image restoration in public scandals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v22i1.12767Keywords:
cross-cultural pragmatics, face management, image restoration, political apologies, politeness theoryAbstract
This study investigates the pragmatic dimensions of political apologies in the context of public scandals, with particular emphasis on face management strategies and image restoration efforts. Drawing upon Brown, et al. (2023) politeness theory and Benoit’s (2022) image restoration theory, this study analyzes 50 political apologies delivered by politicians from five democratic countries the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Japan, and Australia between 2013 and 2023. Data were collected from official transcripts, video recordings, and media coverage, and were examined through the lens of critical discourse analysis. The findings reveal significant variations in both linguistic and non-linguistic strategies. American politicians tend to emphasize personal responsibility and corrective actions. In the United Kingdom, apologies are more implicit, often centering on expressions of regret. French politicians frequently contextualize wrongdoing within broader socio-political discourses. In Japan, apologies typically involve profound gestures and expressions of shame. Meanwhile, Australian politicians often employ self-deprecating humor to diffuse tension. This study contributes to a cross-cultural understanding of face management in political discourse and highlights the importance of cultural intelligence in global crisis communication. The practical implications include guidelines for crafting culturally sensitive apologies to enhance the effectiveness of image restoration efforts for politicians in the aftermath of scandals.References
Abe, K., & Tanaka, S. (2022). Rhetoric of remorse: Comparative analysis of political apologies in Japan and South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2022.2076453
Arendt, C., LaFleche, M., & Limperopulos, M. A. (2023). Meta-analysis of image repair strategies: Effectiveness across crisis types and organizational contexts. Communication Research, 48(3), 412–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221089275
Benoit, W. L. (2024). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory extended (3rd ed.). SUNY Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438496085
Boyd, D. (2016). Apologies and shifting obligation after concealable and unconcealable mistakes. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0893318915619445
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (2023). Politeness theory: Revised framework for the digital era. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Castells, M. (2020). Communication power (3th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Y., & Lee, C. J. (2023). From defense to dialogue: Evolution of image repair theory in social media contexts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 35(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2022.2161717
Coombs, W. T. (2019). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage Publication.
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2022). Pragmatics and the English language: Politeness and impoliteness in contemporary discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92798-1
Fairclough, N. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (5nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Hofstede, G. (2019). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110396925
Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
Jin, Y., & Liu, B. F. (2022). Cultural dimensions of crisis communication: Image repair across eastern and western perspectives. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 101989. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.pubrev.2021.101989
Kampf, Z., & Löwenheim, N. (2018). Rituals of apology in the global arena. Security Dialogue, 43(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/0.1990/14526.8766.25xc
Kampf, Z., & Löwenheim, O. (2022). Public apologies across cultures: Performative aspects of Japanese political contrition. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 35(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09414-7
Kappas, A., & Krämer, N. C. (2023). Nonverbal communication in digital interactions: Theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18574-6
Kimura, T., & Yamaguchi, K. (2023). Nonverbal cues of sincerity in Japanese political apologies: A multimodal analysis of emotional expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 47(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00398-2
Lailiyah, N. (2021). Tindak tutur ekspresif meminta maaf terpidana korupsi di Indonesia. Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics, 6(1), 215. https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v6i2.51038
Lailiyah, N., Hamdani, B., & Khoironi, A. (2024). Tindak tutur performatif dalam sumpah jabatan: Sebuah analisis wacana kritis. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v15i2.848
Lazare, A. (2004). On apology. Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.
Liu, B. F., & Shen, F. (2023). Cross-cultural analysis of political crisis communication: Comparing apologetic strategies in Japan, South Korea, and China. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2147293
Lu, C., Wang, H., & Chen, Y. (2022). Personalized reading recommendation systems for primary students: Improving engagement through AI. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100059
McNair, B. (2018). An introduction to political communication. Routledge.
Nguyen, L. S., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2023). MICS-NEO: Multimodal interaction coding system for neurotypical and neurodivergent populations. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(2), 939–953. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3231957
Nguyen, T. H., Park, S., & Kim, J. (2021). Gesture order: A gesture-based digital ordering system for restaurants. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, X(1), 1–12.
Nye, J. S. (2019). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1999/xz_5300.932210
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Park, H., & Cameron, G. T. (2021). Strategic use of apology in image repair: Cultural variations and effectiveness. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1874176
Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1554–1564.
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Cultural conceptualizations of face: Connections between face and politeness theory revisited. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(1), 130–154. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0063
Tagg, C., Seargeant, P., & Brown, A. A. (2021). Digital communication in higher education. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69268-9
Thompson, R. (2021). Language change in digital communication: An overview of linguistic transformations in the online sphere. Journal of Digital Linguistics, 7(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/2479941X.2021.1890134
Wang, J., & Chen, X. (2023). Digital politeness: Face management in computer-mediated communication. Internet Pragmatics, 10(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00081.wan
Wierzbicka, A. (2021). Pragmatic dimensions in meaning and language change. Routledge.
Yamaguchi, S., & Ikeda, K. (2023). Beyond words: Body language and emotional expressions in Japanese political apologies as cultural scripts. Journal of East Asian Studies, 23(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2022.29
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Lailiyah, Farida Indri Wijayanti, Favorita Kurwidaria, Galuh Kirana Dwi Areni, Monika Widyastuti Surtikanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors of LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya must agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
