ANALYSIS OF MAXIM VIOLATIONS IN THE TED TALKS INTERVIEW WITH ELON MUSK

Authors

  • Lutfia Rahma Purna Marta Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Nina Setyaningsih Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Abstract

An interview, especially regarding issues or phenomenal figures have currently received a lot of public attention. One of whom is Elon Musk, the co-founder and chairman of Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company. His interview in TED Talk entitled "Elon Musk talks Twitter, Tesla and how his brain works — live at TED2022" also attracts the interest of the audience to add insight by listening to how he thinks and also his vision of the future of the world. In the interview, Elon Musk sometimes provides answers that are irrelevant to the questions, thus violating maxim of conversation. This research is aimed at analyzing maxim violations found in the interview. Qualitative descriptive analysis was used in this study. The result reveals that there are 15 maxim of quantity violations, 9 maxim of relation violations, 6 maxim of quality violations, and 4 maxim of manner violations. Maxim of quantity is mostly violated as the conversation is an interview in which the interviewee (Elon Musk) gives a lot of information and shares his thoughts regarding the topic of the interview. This research suggests that violating maxims is also needed in conversations including interview.

References

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatic and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York:

Longman. Grice, H.Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation in Davis S; Pragmatics: A

Reader. New York: Oxford University Press

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Hadi, A. (2013). A critical appraisal of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. Open journal of modern linguistics, 3(1), 69-72.

Khosravizadeh, P., & Sadehvandi, N. (2011). Some instances of violation and flouting of the maxim of quantity by the main characters (Barry & Tim) in Dinner for Schmucks. In International Conference on Languages, Literature and Linguistics (Vol. 26, pp.122-127).

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambidge University Press.

Moleong, L. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nuzulia, I. F. L. (2020). Pragmatic Analysis of Flouting Maxim in Donald Trump’s Interview with TIME in the Oval Office 2020. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(3), 333.https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i3.443

Rahmastra, I. G. B. A., Sosiowati, I. G. A. G., & Yadnya, I. B. P. (2018). The Stategies of Maxim Flouting In Lincoln Movie Script. Jurnal Humanis, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Unud, 22, 943–949.

Slotta, James. (2021). Pragmatics.10.1002/9781118786093.iela0323.

Tupan, A. H., & Natalia, H. (2008). The multiple violations of conversational maxims in lying done by the characters in some episodes of Desperate Housewives. k@ta lama, 10(1), 63-78.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Yule, G. (2014). The Study of Language (Fifth Edition). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

Downloads

Published

2023-07-28

Issue

Section

Articles