MEANING RELATION OF NAZONAZO WORDPLAY
Abstract
This study contains an analysis of the relationship between the meaning of questions and answers on nazonazo. The Japanese nazonazo used in this research was obtained from the website http://nazo-nazo.com/sp/cat395/. This research is to be confined only to the types of easy, very easy, and recommendations from these websites. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The theories used are semantic theory, meaning relation theory, wordplay theory and nazonazo theory. The results of this study show that there are seven meaning relations in nazonazo, namely: synonymy, antonym, polysemy, homonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, as well as naming and metathesis. Homonymy is a meaning relation that appears frequently in nazonazo.References
Akimoto, M. (2002). Yoku Wakaru Goi. Tokyo: Aruku Press.
Chaer, Abdul. (2012). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Chonan, Kazuhide. (2017). Imiron. Jakarta: Darma Persada University.
Dienhart, John.M. (1998). A linguistic look at riddles. Denmark: Odense University. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 95-125.
Hidetosi, S. (1980). How to Deal With Ambiguities While Parsing: EXAM-A Semantic Processing System for Japanese Language. The 8th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1.
Isnain, Ariya. (2017). Jenis dan Relasi Makna Bahasa Melayu Pesisir Sibolga. Thesis.
Ristianasari, R., Saifudin, A. (2014). Makna Metafora dalam Headline Iklan Skincare Majalah Maquia Jepang Edisi Maret 2014. Thesis.
Saeed, John.I. (2003). Semantics (introducing linguistics). Blackwell Publishers.
Saeki, Michiyo. (2021). Nazonazo to nihongo gakushuu. The Center for the Study Area of Foreign language, 178.
Seikai, S. (2011). Nazonazo ni shiyousareru hangigo no kousai. Surugadai University, 42, 87-107.
Setiyanto, Edi. (2015). Relasi Pertanyaan-Jawaban pada Permainan Teka-Teki Silang. Widyaparwa Journal, 48 (2). Balai Bahasa provinsi DIY.
Setyaningsih, N. (2011). Polysemy in Computer Terms. LITE : Jurnal bahasa, sastra, dan budaya, 7 (2), 108-118.
Thaler, V. (2016). “Varieties of Wordplay”, dalam Crossing Languages to Play with Words. 2016. De Gruyter, 47-62.
Zakiyyah, H. et al. (2014). Analisis Kontrastif Permainan Kata Dalam Bahasa Jepang dan Bahasa Indonesia. Thesis.
?y?ko, K. (2017). A Cognitive Linguistics Account of Wordplay. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Website:
https://www.weblio.jp/. accessed on 2 Februari 2022.
http://nazo-nazo.com/sp/cat395/ . accessed on 22 Desember 2021.
