A Video Quality Testing : Review of Human Visual Aspect

Authors

  • Andi Danang Krismawan Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Lekso Budi Handoko Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33633/jais.v6i2.4613

Abstract

Various types of video player applications have been widely used by the community. The emergence of the latest version and a variety of features make people need to make a choice to use a video player application with a good visual level. The type of video that is often played is a file with an MP4 extension. This file type is not heavy but is usually intended for long file durations such as movies. In this paper, we will use a dataset in the form of a movie file with an MP4 extension. The video player applications used include VLC, Quick time, Potplayer, KMPLayer, Media Player Classic (MPC), DivX Player, ACG Player, Kodi, MediaMonkey. Through various empirical calculations, such as Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structutral Similarity Index Measurement (SSIM), Threshold F-ratio, Visual Signal to Noise Ratio (VSNR), Visual Quality Metric (VQM), and Multiscale - Structutral Similarity Index Measurement (MS-SSIM) has analyzed the visual capabilities of each video player application. Experimental results prove that the KMPlayer application gets the best visual results compared to other selected applications.

References

K. Zhu, C. Li, V. Asari, and D. Saupe, “No-reference video quality assessment based on artifact measurement and statistical analysis,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 533–546, 2015.

N. Ponomarenko, V. Lukin, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola, M. Carli, and F. Battisti, “Color image database for evaluation of image quality metrics,” in Proc. IEEE MMSP 2008, 2008, pp. 403–408.

X. Min, G. Zhai, J. Zhou, M. C. Q. Farias, and A. C. Bovik, “Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 6054–6068, 2020.

T. U. of Technology, “Image Quality assessment Perceptual Image Processing.”

Y. Wang, T. Jiang, S. Ma, and W. Gao, “SPATIO-TEMPORAL SSIM INDEX FOR VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China National Engineering Lab for Video Technology , Key Lab of Machine Perception ( MoE ), School of EECS , Peking University ? Beijin,” in Visual Communications and Image Processing 2012, 2012, pp. 1–6.

A. Balachandran, “Developing a Predictive Model of Quality of Experience for Internet Video Categories and Subject Descriptors,” ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 339–350, 2013.

A. V Murthy and L. J. Karam, “A MATLAB-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR IMAGE AND VIDEO QUALITY EVALUATION,” in Energy Engineering, 2010, pp. 242–247.

C. Feng, Z. Xu, S. Jia, W. Zhang, and Y. Xu, “Motion-Adaptive Frame Deletion Detection for Digital Video Forensics,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 8215, no. c, pp. 1–1, 2016.

X. Liao et al., “LiveRender: A Cloud Gaming System Based on Compressed Graphics Streaming,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2128–2139, 2016.

B. F. Dobrian et al., “Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement,” Commun. ACM, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 91–99, 2013.

Y. Zhou, M. Yu, H. Ma, H. Shao, and G. Jiang, “Weighted-to-spherically-Uniform SSIM objective quality evaluation for panoramic video,” in International Conference on Signal Processing Proceedings, ICSP, 2019, vol. 2018-Augus, pp. 54–57.

M. N. Garcia, W. Robitza, and A. Raake, “ON THE ACCURACY OF SHORT-TERM QUALITY MODELS FOR LONG-TERM QUALITY PREDICTION Technische Universit ¨ at Berlin , 2 Deutsche Telekom AG , Berlin , Germany,” in QoMEX, 2015, pp. 0–5.

S. Paulikas, “Estimation of video quality of H.264/AVC video streaming,” in IEEE EuroCon 2013, 2013, no. July, pp. 694–700.

A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, “Efficient motion weighted spatio-temporal video SSIM index,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XV, 2010, vol. 7527, p. 75271I.

U. Sara, M. Akter, and M. S. Uddin, “Image Quality Assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—A Comparative Study,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 07, no. 03, pp. 8–18, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-06

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): Journal of Applied Intelligent System

Section

Articles

License

 
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).