The Rules of Big Brother and Their Parallels with Stalin’s Soviet Union

A Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Muh Firsa Wirawan Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Keywords:

Big Brother, comparative analysis, Joseph Stalin, genetic structuralism, totalitarianism

Abstract

Literature is an artistic expression that often mirrors the social and political realities of its era. It does not exist in isolation but arises from the interaction between human consciousness and historical experience. The central problem of this research lies in the lack of comparative academic studies that examine how George Orwell’s portrayal of dictatorship in Nineteen Eighty-Four reflects and parallels the real-world totalitarian system of Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Both leaders—fictional and historical—constructed societies based on fear, surveillance, and ideological manipulation. This study therefore, aims to analyze the similarities and differences between Big Brother’s authoritarian control and Stalin’s political domination, revealing how literature can function as a mirror of power and oppression. This study employs a qualitative descriptive research design under the framework of Lucien Goldmann’s genetic structuralism. The primary data are drawn from Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, while the secondary data include scholarly articles, historical documents, and critical essays on Stalinism and totalitarian regimes. The method involves textual interpretation, comparative analysis, and sociological contextualization to uncover the ideological structure embedded in Orwell’s narrative. The findings reveal that both Big Brother and Stalin maintained absolute control through propaganda, censorship, historical revisionism, and psychological coercion. Big Brother’s Two Minutes Hate, Thought Police, and Room 101 reflect Stalin’s repressive tactics such as political purges, the NKVD’s surveillance, and forced confessions. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four serves not only as a dystopian fiction but also as a literary reflection of historical totalitarianism.

References

Anne Applebaum. (2003). Gulag: A history. Anchor Books.

Arif, M., Ahmed, H., & Rahman, B. (2018). Dismantling panopticonic regime: Study of Orwell’s 1984. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 2(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/2.1.2

Bailey, A. L. (2004). Soviet policy and doublethink in Politics under the influence.

Celis, E. (2019). The death of Leon Trotsky. Neurosurgery, 67(2), 417–422.

Conquest, Robert. (2008). The great terror: A reassessment. Oxford University Press.

Davies, S., & Harris, J. (2005). Joseph Stalin: Power and ideas. In Stalin (pp. 1–17). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614897.004

Faruk. (2012). Strukturalisme genetik dan teori sastra Lucien Goldmann. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fitzpatrick, S. (1999). Everyday Stalinism ordinary life in extraordinary times Soviet Russia in the 1930s. Oxford University Press. http://www.masterandmargarita.eu

Goldmann, L. (1977). Towards a sociology of the novel. London. London : Tavistock Publications.

Gregory, P., & Harrison, M. (2005). Allocation under dictatorship: Research in Stalin’s archives. Journal of Economic Literature: Vol. XLIII. www.warwick.ac.uk/go/sovietarchives/before

Hingley, R. F. (2025). Joseph Stalin. Encyclopedia Britannica. Https://Www.Britannica.Com/Biography/Joseph-Stalin

Mukherjee, U. (2014). The development of socio-cultural society in Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty Four.” IOSR Journal of Humanitiesa nd Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19(1), 12–16.

Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. https://www.clarkchargers.org/ourpages/auto/2015/3/10/50720556/1984.pdf

Pickvance, C. G. (2001). Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011533211521

Rahman, A. (2025). Mechanics of manipulation: A comparative analysis of Orwell’s 1984 and Chomsky’s propaganda model. Journal of Research and Multidisciplinary, 8(1), 960–973.

Rahman, F. (2019). Save the world versus man-made disaster: A cultural perspective. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 235, 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/235/1/012071

Rushdi, M., & Sabha, N. (2015). The Relationship among the Past, the Present and the Future Scenario: A Critical Study of George Orwell’s 1984. In Online) (Vol. 5, Issue 24). www.iiste.org

Stal, M. (2013). Psychopathology of Joseph Stalin. Psychology, 04(09), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49A1001

Thorp, M. R. (1984). The dynamics of terror in Orwell’s “1984". Brigham Young University Studies, 24(1), 3–17.

Waller, J. (2004). Russia: Death and resurrection of the KGB. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 12(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.12.3.333-355

Wellek, R. (n.d.). Concepts of criticism.

Xhinaku, E., & Pema, O. (2015). The myth of the totalitarian leader in George Orwell’s 1984 and Ismail Kadare’s The Palace of Dreams. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p150

Published

2025-12-24