ILLOCUTIONARY SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS OF VIRTUAL YOUTUBER’S VIEWERS IN SUPER CHAT

Niken Kurniasih, Muhammad Fadhlan Falaakh, Nina Setyaningsih

Abstract


Abstract: Super chats are popular in the Virtual YouTuber community. This platform enable the viewers to donate their money to express what they feel or react to certain situation that is happening during the live stream session. This study aims to find out the speech acts and their illocutionary forces used by the viewers of a Virtual Youtuber in super chats. The data were taken from the archive of a Virtual Youtuber live stream as the interactions in the Super Chat. This research used descriptive qualitative method.  The result of this study shows that the most dominant speech act is expressive (46,53%) followed successively by assertive (28,71%), directive (20,80%), and commissive (3,96%). In addition, some illocutionary forces were found, namely asserting, promising, excommunicating, explaining in pain, inquiring, and ordering. Expressive speech act was mostly used, for example when the viewers thanked a Virtual Youtuber because she/he made the viewer have a happy year. By analyzing the viewers’ speech act pattern, this study further raises the awareness of what the viewers are trying to express while they are watching their favorite streamers.

Keywords: illocutionary speech act, live streaming, pragmatics, super chat, virtual youtuber


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alston, W. P. (2000). Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. New York: Cornell University.

Asykin, B. A. (2021). An Analysis of Illocutionary Act in “Ratatouille” A Movie by Brad Brid. JELT: Journal of English Language Teaching, 175-179.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words the William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955.

Crystal, D. (1997). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. USA: Malden.

Ibrahim, N., & Qura, U. (2021). Speech Acts Used By A Gaming Youtuber In An Online Game Video. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 14(2).

Jap, T., Tiatri, S., Jaya, E. S., & Suteja, M. S. (2013). The development of Indonesian online game addiction questionnaire. PloS one, 8(4), e61098. Leech, G. (1983). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. USA

Lu, Z., Shen, C., Li, J., Shen, H., & Wigdor, D. (2021, May). More Kawaii than a Real-Person Live Streamer: Understanding How the Otaku Community Engages with and Perceives Virtual YouTubers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14).

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: an Introduction. Second Edition. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and Descriptive Research: Data Type versus Data Analysis.

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). India: Bloomsbury Academic.

Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.

Saputro., E. P. (2015). The analysis of Illocutionary Acts of Jokowi’s Speeches.

Sari, W. M. (2012). Illocutionary Force in The Novel Darkest Hour By Cleo Virginia Andrews. (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).

Schriffin. (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. p. 59. Oxford. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary acts. Language in society.

Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Speech acts and illocutionary logic. In Logic, thought and action (pp. 109-132). Springer, Dordrecht.

Severyn, A., Moschitti, A., Uryupina, O., Plank, B., & Filippova, K. (2016). Multi-lingual opinion mining on YouTube. Information Processing & Management, 52(1), 46-60.

Smetanová, M. (2010). Internetové inovácie v oblasti komunikácie / Internet innovations in the communication. In: J. Sipko, M. Chovanec, & G. Har?ariková, (eds.): 5. študentská vedecká konferencia (pp. 911-917). Prešov: Prešov University in Prešov.

Srikandi, C. N. (2020). An analysis of the illocutionary acts on Donald Trump's presidential candidacy speech. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 7-14.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik (Terjemahan Indah Fajar Wahyuni). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zele?áková, M., Pavolová, H., & Bakalár, T. (2012). Internet communication in the process of education at universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2711-2715.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 121 times
PDF - 55 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

This work is licensed under a Creative Comunity 40 International License