Use of hedges ~to omoimasu to soften speech and its implications for Japanese politeness teaching

Irma Winingsih, Budi Santoso, Tri Mulyani Wahyuningsih

Abstract


In Japanese society, the main concept in communicating is to consider the other person's feelings by not speaking directly, too frankly or to the point.  One of the grammatical features this concept is Verb ~omoimasu which means in English ~I think (I think…, I think….). In the result of the essays by the students who take the Japanese Popular Writing course. In his essay students should use these verbs which also function as hedges to express opinions or ideas but ignore them because they may not understand that the use of these functional verbs is to maintain language politeness, especially in communicating in Japanese. Seeing this phenomenon, the writers tried to find out by identifying student essays that do not use these hedges, and the possible causes. Then by adopting the concept of communicating in Japanese that considers the feelings of the other person, the writers have found out how the implications of using these hedges have on the values of politeness in language that have effect on the politeness of behavior of students who take Japanese Popular Article Writing lectures. With research that adopts the concept of communicating in Japanese society, the writers can create a language politeness learning model that is expected to influence behavioral aspects.

Keywords


hedges; to omoimasu; Japanese

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akasu, K., & Asao, K. (1993). Sociolinguistic factors influencing communication in Japan and the United States. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication in Japan and the United States (pp. 88–121). Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Chavez, D. (2004). The Language of uncertainty in a new illness: Hedging and modality in the biomedical discourse of Sever Acute Respiratory Syndrom ( SARS) [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Mahidol.

Doi, T. (1973). Amae no koozoo (The Anatomy of Dependence). Tokyo: Kodansha.

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Journal International Journal of Lexicography.

Ide, S. (1982). Japanese Sociolinguistics Politeness and Women’s Language. Lingua, 57, 357–385.

James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. Longman, Essex.

Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness Markers in English and German. In Coulmas, F. Ed., Conversational Routine. Mouton, The Hague.

Kridalaksana, H. (2001). Kamus Linguistik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip—Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Miyazaki, K. (2002). Ninshiki no modaritii (Epistemic Modality). In Miyazaki, Kazuhito et al., Modariti. Kurosiho Shuppan.

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2011). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Noviana, F., & Saifudin, A. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Pemahaman Wacana Bahasa Jepang (Dokkai) dengan Metode Komprehensif Terintegrasi. Japanese Research on Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 3(1), 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.33633/jr.v3i1.4473

Okugiri, M. (2016). “I think” as Opinion Marker by Japanese Learners of English. JACET 55 th Convention, Japan: Tokyo.

Pateda, M. (1989). Analisis kesalahan. Nusa Indah.

Saifudin, A. (2018). Konteks dalam Studi Linguistik Pragmatik. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 14(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v14i2.2323

Saifudin, A. (2019). Deiksis Bahasa Jepang dalam Studi Linguistik Pragmatik. Japanese Research on Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 2(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.33633/jr.v2i1.3348

Simanjuntak, H. (2010). Kamus Idiom Bahasa. Kesaint Blanc.

Tang, J. (2013). Pragmatic Function of Hedges and Politeness Principal. International Journal of Linguistics & English Literature, 155–160.

Tarigan, H. G. (1988). Pengajaran analisis kesalahan berbahasa. Angkasa.

Taweel, A. Q., & Saidat, E. M. R. (2011). Hedging in Political Discourse. The Linguistics Journal, 5(1), 169.

Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Andi Offset.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/jr.v4i1.5423

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 431 times
PDF - 328 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Irma Winingsih, Budi Santoso, Tri Mulyani Wahyuningsih

ISSN Online: 2655-4836 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal is published by Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia. 

In collaboration with:

   

Indexing & Archiving: