Kerangka Inovasi Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Problem-Solving dan Pengetahuan Mahasiswa
Abstract
Desain pembelajaran dirancang untuk mencapai tujuan pembelajaran. Desain pembelajaran meliputi pedekatan dan perlengkapan yang digunakan dalam proses pembelajaran. Salah satu perlengkapan pembelajaran adalah multimedia. Multimedia adalah salah satu sarana pendukung pembelajaran yang efektif untuk meningkatkan pemahaman siswa. Namun demikian, masih banyak perguruan tinggi yang belum memanfaatkan multimedia dalam proses belajar mengajar. Sebagian besar perguruan tinggi masih menggunakan pendekatan tradisional/direct instruction, dimana lingkungan belajar dalam suasana yang pasif. Selain itu, pendekatan ini menyebabkan prestasi, minat, dan perilaku serta kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah menjadi rendah. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini menawarkan sebuah pendekatan pembelajaran yang mengintegrasikan antara multimedia dengan pendekatan pembelajaran Direct Instruction dan Problem-Based Learning (mDPBL). Pendekatan ini diharapkan mampu menjadi alternative pembelajaran dalam menangani permasalahan diatas.
Kerangka pembelajaran ini dibuat untuk mengukur pengetahuan dan kemapuan memecahkan masalah dalam proses pembelajaran. Kerangka ini terdiri dari empat aktifitas utama yaitu pengenalan dan identifikasi masalah, mendefinisikan masalah dan solusi, evaluasi dan kesimpulan dan luaran pembelajaran.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Rogers, P.L. An Overview of Teacher-Designers: How Teachers Use Instructional Design in Real Classrooms. Bemidji State University. 2003
Skinner, B.F. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan. 1953.
Rias, R.M., and Zaman, H.B. Looking at the Effects of Various Multimedia Approach in Student Learning: A Case Study. ICUIM, January 17-19, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. 2013.
Vaughan, T. Multimedia: Making it Work (4th Ed.), Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill. 1998.
Ossai-Ugbah, N.B. Ogunrombi, S.A. and Ameh, I.O. Motivating use of audio-visuals in a Nigerian technological University library. Journal of Educational and Social Research.Vol.2.No. 1. 2012.
Skutil, M., Havlickova, K., and Matejickova, R. Educational process in terms of teaching methods and organizational forms in small schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 174. pp. 2560-2565. 2015.
Edge, J., and Richards, K. Teachers develop teacher research: Papers on classroom research and teacher development. Oxford: Heineman International. 1993.
Stockard, J. Improving elementary level mathematics achievement in a large urban district: The effects of Direct Instruction in the Baltimore City Public School System. Journal of Direct Instruction, 10, 1-16. 2010.
Robert, J.F., Robyn, A.M., Marie, P.P., Lisa, M.P., and Tim, D.A. Effect of individual direct-instruction tutor on foster children’s academic skills: A randomized traill. Children and Youth Service Review 34, pp.1183-1189. 2012.
Guses, A., Dogar, C., and Gunesm K. A New Approach for Learning: Interactive Direct Teaching Based Constructivist Learning (IDTBCCL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, pp.2384-2389.2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.296.
Blumberg, P. Evaluating the evidence that Problem-Based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D. H. Evensen, and E. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.199-226. 2000.
Kassebaum, D.K., Averbach, R.E., and Fryer, G.E. Student preference for a case based vs. lecture instructional format. J Dent Educ, 55(12), pp.781–784.1991
Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E.J. and Tarve, S.G. Direct Instruction Reading (pp. 5-6; Traub, 1999). Prentice Hall. 2000.
Choi, E., Lindquist, R., and Song Y. Effect of Problem-Based Learning vs. Traditional lecture on Korean nursing students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse Education Today, 34, pp.52-56.2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012
Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., and Ross, S. M. Designing effective instruction (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.1998
Beker, K.H., and Maunsaiyat, S. A comparison of students; achievement and attitudes between constructivist and traditional classroom environment in Thailand vocational electronics programs. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29(2), pp.133-153. 2004
Flynn, R.J., Marquis, R.A., Paquet, M.P., Peeke, L.M., and Daubry, T.D. Effects of individual direct-instruction tutoring on foster children’s academic skills: A randomized trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, pp.1183-1189. 2012.
Virginie, F.C., and Miklos, S. Fifty Years on: A Retrospective on the World's First Problem-based Learning Programme at McMaster University Medical School. Health Professional Education. v5, pp.3-12. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.04.002
Barrows, H.S. Problem-Based Learning in Medicine and Beyond: A Brief Overview. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 68, pp.3-12.1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804.
Nugraini, S.H. E-audiovisual for teaching and learning biology in Indonesia senior high schools. Dissertation, Multimedia University. 2013
Churches, A. Bloom digital taxonomy [Online]. Available: http://www.techlearning.com (2017, Sept. 5). 2001
Osman, K. and Lee, T. Impact of Interactive Multimedia Module with Pedagogical Agents on Students? Understanding and Motivation in the Learning of Electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. National Science Council, Taiwan. 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/joins.v6i2.5053
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 345 timesPDF - 204 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Index by:
 |  |  |  |