GOVERNING BODY
Commitee Team
EDITORIAL POLICY
Policy of Screening for Plagiarism
Abstraction and Indexing
Unique Visit
SUBMISSION
Each submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process. This means that the identities of the reviewers and authors are concealed from each other throughout the review process. The stages are as follows:
Initial Screening: The Editor-in-Chief/Editorial Board conducts a technical and administrative assessment to ensure the manuscript aligns with the journal's scope and guidelines.
Reviewer Assignment: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least one independent reviewers for review.
Reviewers' Evaluation: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field.
Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the Editor will make one of the following decisions: Accepted, Required Revisions (Minor or Major), or Rejected.
Final Approval: Once the final revised version is approved by the Editor, the manuscript will proceed to the publication stage.
GOVERNING BODY
Commitee Team
EDITORIAL POLICY
Policy of Screening for Plagiarism
Abstraction and Indexing
Unique Visit
SUBMISSION