POSITIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES USED IN THE MOVIE “UP (2009)”

intan adelia rahmah wati, sri mulatsih

Abstract


Abstract. Politeness is a person's ethical behavior or speech expression. Politeness is the most important aspect in establishing communication. In language, humans or speakers need to pay attention to language politeness when communicating. With language politeness, a person will be more comfortable in communicating and have more morals for one person and another. In establishing communication in order to create language politeness, of course, it is the same as implementing strategies to achieve good communication. This study aims to determine the positive politeness strategies of utterances contained in the film "Up (2009)". A descriptive-qualitative approach was used in this study. Based on the findings and discussion, the authors have found 9 data on positive politeness speech in the film "Up (2009)" and there are 5 strategies that have been used, including Strategy 2: Exaggerating (interest, approval, sympathy with H), Strategy 5: Looking for agreement, Strategy 10: Offer/Promise, Strategy 12: Include S and H in the activity, Strategy 15: Give gifts to H (goods, sympathy, understanding, cooperation). Strategy 2 is the most widely used strategy to analyze utterances in positive politeness.

Keywords: communication,  positive politeness strategies, up (2009) movie


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Azzawi, J. N. (2011). Compliments and positive politeness strategies. Journal of the college of basic education, 17, 71.

Abdul-Majeed, I. R. K. (2009). The realization of positive politeness strategies in language. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 20, 509-527.

Birner, B. J. (2012). Introduction to pragmatics (Vol. 38). John Wiley & Sons.

Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.

Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of pragmatics, 14(2), 219-236.

Gilks, K. (2010). Is the Brown and Levinson (1987) model of politeness as useful and influential as originally claimed? An assessment of the revised Brown and Levinson (1987) model. INNERVATE Leading Undergraduate Work in English Studies, 2, 94-102.

Holtgraves, T. (1997). Yes, but... positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and social Psychology, 16(2), 222-239.

Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Kitamura, N. (2000). Adapting Brown and Levinson’s ‘politeness’ theory to the analysis of casual conversation. In Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp. 1-8).

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics.

Meier, A. J. (1995). Passages of politeness. Journal of pragmatics, 24(4), 381-392.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Wagner, L. C. (2004). Positive-and negative-politeness strategies: Apologizing in the speech community of Cuernavaca, Mexico. Intercultural Communication Studies, 13, 19-28.

Yabuuchi, A. (2006). Hierarchy politeness: What Brown and Levinson refused to see.

Yuka, A. (2009). Positive politeness strategies in oral communication I textbooks. The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 52(1), 59-70.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 182 times
PDF - 160 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

This work is licensed under a Creative Comunity 40 International License