Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Applied Intelligent System (JAIS) is published by LPPM Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, that focus on research in Intelligent System.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

Biometric, image processing, computer vision, knowledge discovery in database, information retrieval, computational intelligence, fuzzy logic, signal processing, speech recognition, speech synthesis, natural language processing, data mining, adaptive game AI.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts are reviewed anonymously by reviewers appointed by the editor in his area of expertise. Decision for acceptance / rejection of the manuscript will be notified in writing via email. Authors are given an opportunity for two weeks to make improvements (revised) manuscript on the basis of recommendations / suggestions from the reviewer and editor.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in Journal of Applied Intelligent System (JAIS), including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Journal of Applied Intelligent System (JAIS) is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.

 

Editors' responsibilities


Publication decisions
The editor of Journal of Applied Intelligent System (JAIS) is responsible for deciding which of the papers submitted to the journal will be published. The editor will evaluate manuscripts on academic merit alone without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy. The decision will be based on the paper’'s importance, clarity, and the study'’s validity and its relevance to the journal's scope. Current legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism should also be considered. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.


Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.


Reviewers' responsibilities


Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Authors' duties

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.


Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Article Processing Charge and Author Fees

All articles published in this journals are open access and freely available online, immediately upon publication. This journal doesn't charge the author for article submission, processing, and peer review.

Article Processing Charge: Free (0.00 USD)

Article Submission Fee: Free (0.00 USD)

Peer Review Charge: Free (0.00 USD)

 

To support the cost of wide open access dissemination of research results, to manage the various costs associated with handling and editing of the submitted manuscripts, and the Journal management and publication in general, the authors or the author's institution is requested to pay a publication fee for each article accepted. Instructions for money transfer via bank transfer will be provided by the editor with the notification of acceptance for the accepted paper.

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Publication Charge: 30.00 USD (for international author) or Rp 350.000 (for Indonesian author)

(Note for waiver request)

A partial or full waiver of author fees may be decided by the editor in case of lack of funding or other sound reasons provided by the author during the submission. The waiver request will have no effect on the review result of the paper, we do not want fees problem to prevent the publication of worthy work. The author should clearly declare that he asks for a waiver in the comments to the Editor box during their submission, the waiver request is most likely to be denied if it is not asked in this stage. The waiver is intended primarily for authors from low-income countries (http://data.worldbank.org/income-level/LIC) who are without funding. It is unlikely that a waiver will be granted to authors from established academic or research centers in the developed world.